The purpose of the hearing is to rule and make recommendation to
the Luverne City Council on the following:
1. Requested conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by
Terry Gray, to open and operate a Cannabis Retail Establishment,
located at 206 West Main Street (20-1649-000), in D - Downtown
District, City of Luverne, Minnesota.
2. Requested conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by
Terry Gray, to open and operate a Cannabis Retail Establishment,
located at 218 East Main Street (20-1125-000), in D - Downtown
District, City of Luverne, Minnesota.
3. Requested conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by
Dylan Stokes, to open and operate a Cannabis Retail and
Manufacturing Establishment, located at 1202 South Kniss Avenue
(20-1943-000), in H-C - Highway Commercial District, City of
Luverne, Minnesota.
4. Requested conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by
Peter Dikun, to open and operate a Cannabis Retail Establishment,
located at 704 South Kniss Avenue (20-0675-000), in C-C -
Community Commercial District, City of Luverne, Minnesota.
5. Requested conditional use permit (CUP) application submitted by
Terry Kapple, to open and operate a Cannabis Retail
Establishment, located at 401 South Kniss Avenue (20-0037-200),
in C-C - Community Commercial District, City of Luverne,
Minnesota.
The following were in attendance at the Public Hearing: Rose Grant,
Dylan Stokes, Pamela Kapple, Carol Morgan, Jim Den Herder, Ken
Vos, Melissa Fick, Peter Dikun and Lori Sorenson.
Chair Nath opened the Public Hearing at 5:05 p.m. During the public
hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed five conditional use
permit (CUP) applications for cannabis retail and manufacturing
establishments at various locations throughout Luverne. Staff
explained that each application was required to meet city zoning
ordinance standards, including designated zoning districts and
buffer requirements from schools and parks. The purpose of the
CUP process is to ensure that proposed uses will not be injurious to
neighboring properties, impede orderly development, or lack
adequate utilities and parking, and that any potential nuisances
such as odor are addressed. Public input was received from Ken
Vos, which included questions regarding parking, setbacks from
residences, and hours of operation, which staff addressed by
referencing city and state regulations. It was clarified that
neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for approving or